52 pages • 1 hour read
A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
On November 5, Guy Fawkes Day, Constable Johnson arrests a young woman whom he catches stealing from a “prostrate man” during the celebrations. While the woman, Alice Nelson, sits in the station waiting to be processed, she tells the station sergeant, Dalby, that she wants to make a deal. She tells him that she knows the screwsman (lockpicker) who participated in the Great Train Robbery and states that the man in question is in Newgate Prison. They question her and learn that she is Robert Agar’s lover; Agar has been arrested for “forging five-pound notes” (258).
Harranby questions Agar, who initially denies knowing Pierce or anything about the heist. Harranby pretends to read Agar’s past criminal record from a piece of paper and says that Agar will likely be sent to Australia for his next offense. Three days later, Agar confesses everything he knows about Pierce and the heist in exchange for a lenient sentence. On November 13, authorities raid Pierce’s house, but he is away in Manchester attending a boxing match.
The authorities take Agar to the boxing match, where he identifies Pierce (a.k.a. John Simms), who is arrested. Pierce tells Harranby, “You’ll never hold me” (266). By November 19, Pierce, Burgess, and Agar are all being held at Newgate Prison. Miriam and Barlow are still at large and the money is still missing, so the press is not informed of the arrests.
On November 22, Harranby interviews Pierce, who refuses to tell him anything. To encourage him to talk, Harranby moves Pierce to the “dreaded” Coldbath Fields prison. However, when Harranby interviews Pierce again four weeks later, he still refuses to talk. Prime Minister Lord Palmerston presses Harranby to close the case and find the money. In an interview on February 6, Pierce reveals that the gold is at the crypt in St. John’s Wood, but when the authorities search this location, they find no gold. In March of 1857, the Times of London reports on Pierce’s arrest. A trial date for the co-conspirators is set for July 12, 1857.
Burgess and Agar give their testimony first during the trial, but they do not have many of the details. Meanwhile, there is rampant speculation about the criminal mastermind, Pierce. However, on the day Pierce gives his testimony, the public is distracted by the “Indian Mutiny,” an uprising of people in India against the British colonial authorities. In June, Indian soldiers known as sepoys massacre 1,000 British citizens after the siege of Cawnpore, and by July, the British public is clamoring for revenge.
Pierce is proud and remorseless in his testimony. He says that he last saw Barlow when Barlow visited him in prison six days prior, at which time they discussed how Pierce plans to escape. On August 1, Pierce criticizes Lord Cardigan for his role in the charge of the light brigade. The papers report little of this part of the trial.
On August 2, the prosecutor asks Pierce why he did the heist. Pierce responds, “I wanted the money” (279). He is then taken from the Old Bailey, the courthouse in London, in handcuffs. As he is being escorted to the prison van, a woman (presumably Miriam in disguise) kisses him on the mouth and likely slips him some handcuff keys. Later, the police guards are found in a gutter; they have been beaten up by Barlow. Piece, Barlow, and Miriam are never found.
Burgess is sentenced to two years in prison, where he dies of cholera. Agar is sent to Australia after all, where he later dies a wealthy man in Sydney. Mr. Harranby dies after being kicked in the head by a horse that he was whipping. Elizabeth Trent marries and has four children. Henry Fowler dies of “unknown causes.” In 1862, Pierce, Barlow, and Miriam are said to be in Paris, and six years later, they are said to be in New York, but these reports remain unconfirmed, and authorities never find the stolen gold.
The final section of The Great Train Robbery covers the arrest of Pierce and his co-conspirators, the trial, and its aftermath, indulging in a darker angle of Examining the Nuances of Victorian Society: namely, the management of crime. The Victorian approach to this task employed cruel methods that would today be recognized as torture: the cockchafer or prison treadmill, the shot-drill, and the crank. As described by Crichton, it was believed that such methods would leave a prisoner with “his body damaged, nerves shot, and resolution so enfeebled that his ability to commit further crimes was severely impaired” (268). Although Crichton often fabricates the seemingly historical elements of his stories, the cockchafer was indeed a historical reality. Rather than acknowledging the connection between crime and the vast social and income inequalities in their society, Victorians persisted in viewing lower- and working-class criminal activities as a form of moral weakness that could be broken through physical punishment. (Ironically, upper-class criminal activities were largely overlooked, as discussed in Part 1.)
Another historically accurate punishment described by Crichton is the practice of transporting convicted criminals to Australia. Between 1788 and 1868, over 162,000 prisoners were sent to Australia from Britain and Ireland (“Convict Transportation Peaks.” National Museum Australia, 20 Sept. 2022). In this light, a slightly ambiguous aspect of the narrative can be found in Agar’s response to Harranby’s threat to send Agar to Australia. Agar acts “greatly agitated” despite Crichton’s observation that many prisoners found transport to Australia preferable to prison. Indeed, it is revealed in the final chapter that Agar became “a wealthy man in Sydney, New South Wales, Australia” (280). This development suggests that Agar turned on Pierce, not because he felt he had no choice, but because he was hoping for a trial that would result in his release from prison, where he was serving time for check forgery. In these circumstances, being sent to Australia would afford him a much greater degree of freedom.
In the final chapters, it becomes clear that rather than portraying Pierce and his co-conspirators as the low-life criminals that Victorian society deems them to be, Crichton portrays them as heroes—or at the very least, as antiheroes. For example, Pierce is intelligent, clever, and unafraid to speak his mind about authority figures like Lord Cardigan. Significantly, while the real-life Pierce served a two-year prison sentence for the heist, Crichton gives the fictional Pierce a much more heroic ending, declaring that he escapes to live in “splendid circumstances” in Paris and New York with his lover Miriam and his getaway driver. Thus, the true details of the event are shifted to fit the whimsy of storytelling, providing an ending that celebrates the audacity of Pierce and his team, however inaccurate this conclusion may be.
Plus, gain access to 8,800+ more expert-written Study Guides.
Including features:
By Michael Crichton